So now you know the lens through which we offer our critique.is excellent, with creative artwork at each transition, beautiful landscapes, and technical prowess. Tackett for his desire for the world to know truth.In exploring the natural evidence for such truths, should one only seek the input of those who agree with you?Much can be gained by considering the arguments of those of differing views, yet in the movie Dr.How does an earth-scouring watery cataclysm, with a miraculous removal of all traces of these organisms, provide “the only explanation that makes sense"?Similar examples and explanations can be made about each section of the film.
The giant lakes turn out to be speculation, with no actual evidence of their proposed size.
Tackett purports to go on a journey to discover whether a literalist interpretation of Genesis yields a historically reliable account of earth’s history.
The film is beautifully produced and no doubt will be held up by many as a model of Christian scholarship.
We long for the day when the church will realize that the gospel and the authority of Scripture do not need to be propped up with convoluted arguments and misrepresentations of the natural world. He research focuses on understanding biological diversity by examining differences in DNA sequences and genome structure.
When nature is allowed to proclaim its message without preconceived notions of its history, it declares the glory of God just fine (Ps 19:1, Rom ). The original sentence read, “The global presence of the Great Unconformity exists only in Dr. He has worked on numerous plant and animals systems and has authored more than 40 research articles in science journals.